QA/QC Geophysics Work

QA/QC workflow for airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys

Below is an example of the typical QA/QC steps that IGS applies on geophysical surveys (as independent QC consultants)

QA/QC workflow for airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys

Pre-Survey / Survey Commencement

  • Evaluate logistical, safety, emergency response, permitting, insurance, crew qualifications, flight planning, drape surface, aircraft suitability, survey equipment lists, and data security measures.
  • Report findings and recommendations to the Client to optimize safety, quality, and efficiency.
  • Review calibration results for navigation systems, aircraft and base station magnetometers, and radiometric sensors.
  • Validate accuracy, noise levels, synchronization, and spectral performance.
  • Carry out site visit to Inspect survey aircraft, equipment, calibration/test results, survey procedures, and crew understanding of project requirements.

 

  • Review initial production data for quality and deliverables standards compliance
  • Compare datasets in multi-aircraft surveys via system comparison lines.

Production (Field) Data QC

  • Conduct regular audits of navigation (line separations, flight path adherence, altitudes, GPS quality), magnetic data (sensor consistency, noise, gaps, drift), base station data (location suitability, diurnal stability, noise, filtering), and radiometric data (daily consistency tests, spectral drift, resolution, sampling rates, corrections).
  • Address issues through data reprocessing or survey reflights.
  • Verify calibrations and tests of any replaced equipment, survey coverage completion, and quality of final production data.
  • Review interim and final navigation, magnetometer, and radiometric test results. Confirm post-survey calibrations meet standards.
  • Approve field data for project demobilization.

Deliverables QC

  • Assess processing methodologies, levelling techniques, database structure, gridding procedures, coordinate references, and draft map templates.
  • Review interpretation methods and results (where applicable)
  • Validate final magnetic and radiometric databases, grids, enhanced products, elevation models, maps (digital and hardcopy), interpretation results, and survey reports for completeness, accuracy, and conformity to specifications.

IGS also offers QA/QC on other types of surveys e.g. EM, Gravity/AGG etc.

Along with standard checks above for mag/rad surveys (navigation and magnetometer systems), additional QAQC procedures for active and passive EM systems, gravity and gravity gradiometry systems are offered.

EM Systems (TDEM, FDEM, passive EM systems)

  • Review instrumentation including sampling rate, sensitivity, noise envelopes. Evaluate EM noise characteristics independently.
  • Review system specific calibrations and test lines results.
  • Verify channel widths, numbers, frequencies.
  • Perform EM sensor orthogonality checks (e.g. for FDEM, AFMAG).
  • Assess signal-to-noise ratios and noise levels (including 50Hz and sferics monitors)
  • Verify EM system motion (Tx-Rx relative motion) and corrections for this.
  • Compare primary field measurements (Tx-Rx) for consistency.
  • Check EM data quality (gaps, artifacts) and repeatability.
  • Conduct resolution and terrain clearance assessments.
  • Validate flight velocity and transmitter spacing.
  • Verify sensor coil orientation/directionality for rover and base (AFMAG)
  • Review tipper in-phase and quadrature for all EM channels; review in-phase -rotated divergence for low/middle/high frequencies (AFmag)
  • Perform independent EM inversion or conductivity depth imaging (CDI) as needed.

Gravity/Gravity Gradiometry Systems QA/QC

Note the following are generalised steps and more specific QC steps are applied depending on particular system and whether a gravimeter, gradiometer (incl. full and partial tensor systems of different generations).

  • Check that raw data is archived, and instrument noise is minimized.
  • Validate that noise levels meet survey specifications (defined with appropriate filter cut-offs).
  • Conduct daily background/system drift checks and confirm zero-level stability.
  • Assess daily/weekly test line results for repeatability and multi-channel consistency.
  • Verify flight-to-flight and line-to-line data consistency in base level, amplitude, and wavelength.
  • Verify that GPS positional and acceleration measurements meet specifications and GPS derived corrections effectively remove motion noise.
  • Verify filtering and decimation of profile data is appropriate to retain signal fidelity.
  • Apply terrain corrections using accurate (e.g. LiDAR) DEM and suitable density models, accounting for geology, ice and lake effects.
  • In-field processing should generate image-quality grids (e.g., Bouguer, Free-Air, or gradients) sufficient to allow sign-off of data before demobilisation.
  • For gradiometry systems, verify inline sums, consistent behaviour of redundant tensor components, appropriate long wavelength trends, quiescent noise consistency.
  • Review turbulence levels and related noise.

Quality Assurance & Quality Control of RGP Projects

 

Survey design

 

Data products

Other Services